Rochester vs. Antoinette

I've heard several people talk in and outside of class on their opinions of whether or not Rochester and/or Antoinette deserve sympathy. For one, I think it's very important to look at their past to explain their actions in the present. For both of them, they clearly had family issues, with Rochester feeling undervalued/disowned because of his father giving everything to his first son according to their family tradition. For Antoinette, we can clearly see that her mother doesn't seem to care about her, not even knowing or caring where she is or who she's with. In addition, Antoinette unlike Rochester doesn't actually have her real father, instead she gets Mr. Mason, who only seems to cause more problems upon his arrival. I think that this similarity in their past is crucial to even start comparing how bad their actions are later in their life.

When it comes to deciding who is worthy of my sympathy, the past can be used to explain the reasoning for why it was done, but it cannot be used to justify the actions that take place. Rochester knowingly tortures a mentally challenged person which I can only assume is for his satisfaction and pride, while Antoinette basically rapes Rochester. Both of these are completely inexcusable, regardless of what happened to a person to make them resort to said outcomes. While I don't think either deserve sympathy, I think that Antoinette's case clearly seems like the more obvious to receive more warmth from the majority. Antoinette clearly seems to be the more mentally instable of the two, seems to have had the harsher past, mainly because she was put into this situation from early on without having any information or knowledge about it and also being almost completely isolated from the rest of the world, constantly being bullied and harassed. The big issue I have with Rochester is his incentive for mentally torturing Antoinette, there really doesn't seem to be any moral reason that he does it, other than for personal revenge. In this sense he seems like a man child, unable to handle a situation maturely and feeling the need to get back at Antoinette for raping him and hurting his pride as a cause of that rather than being the better man and walking away/letting the police handle it. In conclusion, Rochester deserves hate while Antoinette doesn't deserve approval or praise.

Comments

  1. It's clear that they both had their issues but like you said these issues don't excuse them both escalating the abuse. Antoinette seems more sympathetic to me because even though the love potion is pretty despicable it seemed like to came from some twisted form of love instead of Rochester which comes from pride and hate

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kids, this is why arranged marriage is bad. I agree that Rochester deserves hate. He is the "King" in this relationship and he makes most of the decisions for Antoinette. Since Rochester is an unjust king, Antoinette, a responsible citizen, simply rebelled against the unjust king. I don't condone or endorse date rape drug.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This kind of reminds me on the question we kept coming back to with The Stranger, "does it make sense to judge people?". I think this book presents the side saying yes we can. While a lot of what both characters do can be seen as understandable given the context of what they had been through in life, there are pretty clear points where both characters step over the line into what most would consider inexcusable. For Antionette it's when she drugs Rochester and for Rochester it's when he basically abducts Antionette.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think they are both in many ways made out to be sympathetic characters. Rhys seems eager to in her quest to complicate a one dimensional character, to not inadvertently portray the other as one dimensional. I think that both characters to horrible things to each other and question the justice of morally weighing their motivations. Is a horrible act done for love any less horrible than one done for pride or hate?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think a very important distinction is that Antoinette was discriminated against throughout her childhood, her mother died, her brother died, and her house was burned down. Rochester was a bit of a disappointment to his parents but he had privilege on his side, and had a much easier childhood. So I think Antoinette is a child of circumstance and Rochester is just f***ed in the head.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's hard to say that Rochester deserves more hate because he mentally tortured Antoinette. If you are referring to him locking her in the attic, one could argue that he isn't physically harming her by doing this, but Antoinette did physically abuse him by drugging and raping him. I don't think you can evaluate who's actions are more justified because of their pasts, because having a rough past isn't really a valid excuse--legally at least.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Importance of Names

I thought I was a cat person

Septimus's Sexuality